Parents Feedback

Parents Feedback on Curriculum 

The institution regularly collects feedback on curriculum among from parents who are the important Stakeholders of our institution. Parent Teacher Meeting is periodically conducted and their suggestions are regularly obtained and analyzed. Necessary updation is carried in the curriculum design and syllabus for the betterment of the student community.

The following parameters are accommodated in the feedback.

  • 1. The content and quantum of syllabus.
  • 2. Qualities of the staff assigned to cover syllabus.
  • 3. Time allowed to complete the syllabus.
  • 4. Availability of Laboratory Facilities to cover syllabus.
  • 5. Availability of Library Facilities.
  • 6. Accessibility to Faculty.
  • 7. Scope of the syllabus leading to Higher Studies.
  • 8. Evaluation System
  • 9. Job Opportunities after completion of the syllabus.
  • 10. Overall views about Curriculum.

No. of Respondents per YearAcademic Year Parents Feedback Chart 

Total No. of Respondents: 882

Q. No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 526 62 293 35 22 3 0 0
2 590 70 228 27 26 3 0 0
3 523 62 300 36 24 3 1 0
4 552 66 267 32 23 3 0 0
5 560 67 260 31 22 3 0 0
6 545 65 263 31 33 4 0 0
7 534 63 280 33 28 3 0 0
8 479 57 340 40 21 2 0 0
9 505 60 288 34 47 6 1 0
10 554 66 255 30 32 4 0 0


2018- 2019


Total No. of Respondents: 99

Q.No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 55 56 44 44 0 0 0 0
2 52 53 40 40 5 5 2 2
3 48 48 37 37 14 14 1 1
4 45 45 43 43 9 9 3 3
5 45 45 44 44 8 8 3 3
6 49 49 39 39 12 12 0 0
7 47 47 48 48 5 5 0 0
8 40 40 48 48 11 11 1 1
9 38 38 50 50 10 10 2 2
10 50 50 42 42 8 8 0 0

2017- 2018

Total No. of Respondents: 104

Q.No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 55 53 45 43 3 3 1 1
2 72 69 26 25 6 6 0 0
3 59 57 35 34 7 7 2 2
4 60 58 44 42 0 0 0 0
5 62 60 33 32 8 8 0 0
6 62 60 33 32 7 7 1 1
7 51 49 41 39 10 10 2 2
8 51 49 45 43 6 6 2 2
9 45 43 47 45 11 11 1 1
10 58 56 40 38 6 6 0 0

2016- 2017

Total No. of Respondents: 107 

Q.No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 59 55 46 43 2 2 0 0
2 67 63 33 31 5 5 1 1
3 64 60 36 34 5 5 1 1
4 50 47 46 43 10 9 1 1
5 62 58 41 38 3 3 1 1
6 62 58 42 39 3 3 0 0
7 65 61 34 32 6 6 1 1
8 47 44 51 48 6 6 2 2
9 56 52 34 32 15 14 2 2
10 47 44 50 47 9 8 1 1

2015- 2016

Total No. of Respondents: 109

Q.No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 58 53 49 45 2 2 0
2 71 65 32 29 5 5 1 1
3 62 57 34 31 11 10 2 2
4 56 51 46 42 8 7 0 0
5 64 59 38 35 7 6 0 0
6 63 58 44 40 2 2 0 0
7 63 58 40 37 5 5 0 0
8 53 49 47 43 8 7 1 1
9 59 54 32 29 17 16 1 1
10 58 53 45 41 7 6 0 0

2014- 2015

Total No. of Respondents: 133

Q.No Excellent Good Average Poor
No % No % No % No %
1 72 54 49 37 9 7 3 2
2 77 58 44 33 9 7 3 2
3 84 63 40 30 9 7 0 0
4 64 48 55 41 11 8 4 3
5 78 59 48 36 4 3 3 2
6 73 55 48 36 12 9 0 0
7 68 51 52 39 9 7 4 3
8 56 42 65 49 11 8 1 1
9 65 49 59 44 8 6 1 1
10 68 51 53 40 11 8 1 1

2013- 2014

Action Taken Report as Minuted in Academic Council Meeting Minutes - View Meeting Minutes